Ir para o conteúdo principal

Vídeo-aula 04

Congruência teórica e rigor na Pesquisa Qualitativa em Saúde

Título original: Theoretical Congruence and Rigour in Qualitative Health Research

Docente: Dra. Denise Gastaldo, University of Toronto

Assistir no YouTube

Leituras sugeridas

  1. Eakin, J., Robertson, A., Poland, B., Coburn, D., & Edwards, R. (1996). Towards a critical social science perspective on health promotion research. Health Promotion International, 11(2), 157-165.
  2. Eakin, J. M., & Mykhalovskiy, E. (2003). Reframing the evaluation of qualitative health research: Reflections on a review of appraisal guidelines in the health sciences. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 9(2), 187-194.
  3. Gastaldo, D. (2015). Elements for writing up a qualitative methodology chapter in a doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from www.ccqhr.utoronto.ca/teaching/teaching-resources
  4. Kitto, S., Chesters, J., & Grbich, C. (2008). Quality in qualitative research – Criteria for authors and assessors in the submission and assessment of qualitative research articles for the Medical Journal of Australia. The Medical Journal of Australia, 188(4), 243-246.
  5. Ravenek, M. J., & Laliberte Rudman, D. (2013). Bridging conceptions of quality in moments of qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12, 436-456.
  6. Taylor, B., & Francis, K. (2013). Qualitative research in the health sciences: Methodologies, methods and processes. New York, NY: Routledge.
  7. Gastaldo, D., Carrasco, C., & Magalhaes, L. (2012). Entangled in a web of exploitation and solidarity: Latin American undocumented workers in the Greater Toronto Area. Retrieved from: http://www.migrationhealth.ca/undocumented-workers-ontario/summary-findings.